LA Angels Weekend News Crash: Winners!

What a week! The Angels swept Texas at home then won 2 out of 3 in the Motor City. This winning thing is kind of fun.

Not to fill up the hopium pipes, but as of 4 PM Thursday afternoon our hapless Halos sit a mere 6 games out of the division lead. Which says a lot about the division as those same Halos are 22-35.

Vaughn Grissom had himself a game on Tuesday night, including a grand slam that secured the Angels win.

The Angels were winning but I took a big L when trying to delve into the fantasy baseball world. I told everyone to start Mike Trout this week because he is crushing it on the road. But he made me look good yesterday.

The old guy showed off some wheels as well.

And, hey, at least I got a lot of yesterday’s prediction correct.

Grayson Rodriguez has looked better each time out. Yesterday his slider was nasty.

One thing I genuinely love about CtPG is the instant feedback. I don’t get that On SI. No, people there have to take time to email me or track me on social media to tell me I suck. Not many, but it happens.

I expected more backlash when I stated keeping the team name Los Angeles makes far more sense than going back to Anaheim. I only received on email and it was worded so nicely that it came across like my aunt pointing out a mistake and being disappointed in me, not angry.

Can the team keep the momentum as they head to Tampa Bay? That will be tough.

Tampa Bay does not play in Tampa Bay, by the way. But nobody is freaking out about their name.

Before all this winning (and even now) the biggest aim of Angels fans is to get Arte Moreno to sell. Will the shirts off, chants, and protests get Arte’s attention?

From around baseball:

Owners and the union have exchanged proposals. Both have concepts of a salary floor which I’ve long stated is just as important as a cap.

The MLBPA took the opening salvo with more revenue sharing, a floor, and no cap.

The owners countered with a higher floor but a cap.

This is epic.

I’ll be doing some deep dives into both proposals but the optimist in me sees both sides working on a floor and better revenue sharing. The dealmaker in me likes to start with the things upon which we agree then build from there.

Enjoy your weekend and link what I missed. I am buried at work right now. I’m actually going to be able to get out on my bike and burn off some calories and stress this weekend. I miss being in shape. Time with my family will be top priority.

Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TrojanBoiler
Super Member
28 minutes ago

While I agree that the Home Run for Anaheim act is classic government overreach, I don’t know that I agree with the assessment that naming the team Los Angeles will magically produce more fans or media revenue.

People out here will root for the Angels because they are the closest team to them or because they don’t want to be a “bandwagon” Dodgers fan. I don’t think anyone in Riverside is saying “WAIT you’re telling me the Angels aren’t in Los Angeles? This changes everything!”

As far as media is concerned – the Angels will always be the little brother to the Dodgers regardless of whether they use Los Angeles or Anaheim in their name. They just aren’t as big of a brand. Compare this to a team like Green Bay which is a huge national brand and they claim a city that nobody has heard of otherwise. The city does not make the brand.

Also, the comparison with teams like the Pistons and the Cowboys aren’t apples to apples. Those teams are the ONLY teams in those cities and thus represent the metro area as a whole. In the case of the Angels, there is a team in Los Angeles, and the Angels are not that team. I think the only other example of a team doing this is the New York Islanders in the NHL, and you could argue that the NY is simply the state in which they are located. Not to mention their logo has a picture of Long Island and their name is the Islanders – they are pretty proudly stating where they are located.

Angels2020Champs
Legend
1 hour ago

Even sosh is anti angels:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DY5wuc6k7V-/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Helping out oral open open a chevy dealership

MarineLayer
Legend
2 hours ago

Since we’re playing for nothing, I think it’s insane we’re starting a Journeyman at 3B instead of Grissom and Peraza. What in the world is wrong with our failing franchise.

toad2065
Trusted Member
7 minutes ago
Reply to  MarineLayer

This is how they make it easier to slip Moncada back into place. Also, somebody in authority hates Peraza.

RexFregosi
Super Member
2 hours ago

Favorite baseball players Spring 2026:

1. Mike Trout
2. Langdon Hariston
3. Cole Carlon

Forks Up! First of two trips to Nebraska starts tonight.

Hariston should win Golden Spikes and Carlon will be a first round pick.

RIP to Bob Horner who was both.

BannedInLA
Legend
2 hours ago

Probably won’t happen today or ever, but here’s hoping to see Pazuzu, Trout, Neto in the top 3 slots. With the way Grissom is driving in runs this week, he can bat 4th.

Roy Hobbs
Super Member
21 minutes ago
Reply to  BannedInLA

I like that banned and have Soler and Adell hit 5-6. Why in the world is are you hitting your second best hitter (Peraza) 7th? And keep Shanuel out of the first 5 when he returns.

grichmanpoorman
Trusted Member
3 hours ago

Checking the ACL box score every morning is turning into a dependable little cup of espresso. Like last year, intriguing/exciting players at the plate and on the rubber… including one of last year’s overslot arms, Xavier Mitchell, who’s put up near-impeccable numbers in two brief appearances: https://www.milb.com/player/xavier-mitchell-815718

Last edited 3 hours ago by grichmanpoorman
RexFregosi
Super Member
2 hours ago

I need to get to Diablo to see them before it gets hot! Not too bad right now.

grichmanpoorman
Trusted Member
22 minutes ago
Reply to  RexFregosi

Yeah, right now would be the right time. 88 today.

grichmanpoorman
Trusted Member
21 minutes ago

… and not the Nazi kind.

CAoldskoll
Trusted Member
4 hours ago

No surprise the MLBPA sent a silly proposal with a salary floor and no cap, and it included a cut in luxury tax. Total joke, Dodgers and Yanks love it. Owners proposal with $245 cap may be a fantasy, but man I would love to see our blue neighbor squirm around trying to figure out how to deal with having a $70 and $60 (Tucker!) mil player taking up majority of the payroll.

Roy Hobbs
Super Member
57 seconds ago
Reply to  Jeff Joiner

That’s a good strategy. Instead of exchanging offers, why don’t they both talk about what they want and what will actually work. You can’t just have just have both sides wanting more money without any consideration for the health of the business.

Roy Hobbs
Super Member
4 minutes ago
Reply to  CAoldskoll

The purpose of the floor and the Cap is to level the [playing field so if the cap is too high it serves no purpose and the number of players affected by a high cap is minimal. To actually do this today you would need to make everyone be between $150M and $250M. I don’t think the players would ever accept a $250M cap. But in order to have a $300M cap, the floor would need to be $200M and I don’t believe all the clubs could afford to do that.

In the NBA and the NFL, everyone can afford to spend to the cap which I don’t believe is true for MLB unless the cap is pushed too low. So having a floor and a cap that are unrelated to each other is very doable, but having a floor and a cap that actually increase competitiveness is a non starter because what the players will accept is not compatible with what the current smaller markets can afford.

GrandpaBaseball
Legend
4 hours ago

Trout with two doubles in one game was simply amazing, really. But the scoring a run and sliding like Superman was vintage also. 😍 

YOUknowulovetheIE
Super Member
4 hours ago

Could’ve easily had 3. He roped one right to the rf

RexFregosi
Super Member
1 hour ago

About the only thing I follow in 2026 is Baseball Reference Career WAR Leaders.

Mike should be in Top 45 soon enough catching G Perry and S Carlton.

Everything else this year in the Haloverse is irrelevant.

Pineapple12
Legend
4 hours ago

Soriano, Rodriguez, Detmers, Urena

Bachman, Silseth, Fermin, Zeferjahn

Mike Maddux is doing the Lord’s work. I’m not sure what the likelihood is that Joyce and Kikuchi return from injury, but if they can it takes this pitching staff to an even higher level.

GrandpaBaseball
Legend
4 hours ago

Great game yesterday, Angels. Rare event was seen too, KTTV 10pm news showed Angels highlights prior to the Dodgers last night. 😃 

2pints
Super Member
2 hours ago

Dodgers had the day off lol

HalosFanForLife
Super Member
4 hours ago

Great point on Tampa Bay playing in St Pete. So I got to thinking. The Jets and Giants don’t play in New York. The Cowboys don’t play in Dallas. The Bills don’t play in Buffalo. Washington REDSKINS – play in Maryland. The Las Vegas Raiders play in Paradise. The 49ers play in Santa Clara. But Anaheim deserves special treatment. Got it.

GrandpaBaseball
Legend
4 hours ago

Don’t forget the Inglewood Rams and Chargers and Clippers too. It really doesn’t matter what the Angels are called right now other than losing. Losing games, losing the faithful on radio and television, and losing attendance.

2pints
Super Member
2 hours ago
Reply to  Jeff Joiner

I think the real cause of the constant bashing is due to the name being changed relatively recently. If the team was LA Angels since inception, we’d basically be like those teams listed above, but going from Anaheim to LA in recent years has allowed for people to have an opinion on the name, instead of just accepting that that’s how its always been. Also, changing it to the LA Angels of Anaheim really didn’t help the situation since that’s just the stupidest name I can think of for a sports team.

BannedInLA
Legend
2 hours ago

Whatever the case, the most aesthetically pleasing name for this team is and always will be the “California Angels”.

steelgolf
Legend
2 hours ago
Reply to  BannedInLA

^ This … CA Angels ^ . And remember, “Git offa my lawn”!

BannedInLA
Legend
4 minutes ago
Reply to  steelgolf

Words to live by my friend, words to live by.

29
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x